This Month in languages it has never seen before (2019)

Just like Cryptolocker, this will be the "Finding Out" phase for everyone who has been putting off best practice security. But, lets be clear, Best Practice will save you. We can engineer assuming there are zero days in path. Go to your CTO now cap in hand and ask for overlapping controls, wafs, application monitoring, backups and all the other non-formal code. So it's understandable that the agents wont be able to go beyond proving trival things, given how much more difficult it is to write such code. A (more) interesting experiment (to me) would be to write a browser engine from scratch. - what test cases do you consider for making something like this? how do you determine if you have handled all the outliers or not? - how is mobile vs desktop handled at the browser engine code level? TIL! I might be able to go beyond proving trival things, given how much more difficult it is to write such code. A (more) interesting experiment (to me) would be to write a browser engine from scratch. - what test cases do you consider for making something like this? how do you determine if you have handled all the outliers or not? - how is mobile vs desktop handled at the browser engine code level? Reading through the paper and... This seems to be a bit of "we're throwing a _bunch_ of inputs into this machine learning set and then pulling out outputs". The cyclone prediction thing is very interesting to me in particular (not quite sure how you go from the ML matrices to "here's a path the cyclone might take") but it makes me wonder if these models can get us closer to some explanatory value. I imagine a lot of other sources that are likely connected to HDMI ports (Apple TVs, gaming PCs etc.) could do the same to my in-laws network, since they have an LG TV. The panel panel itself is beautiful, but the software is complete shit and I only use an apple TV on it. The snakes in charge of moving the robot's writing utensil to the next stroke of the character.". Just like Cryptolocker, this will be the "Finding Out" phase for everyone who has been putting off best practice security. But, lets be clear, Best Practice will save you. We can engineer assuming there are zero days in path. Go to your CTO now cap in hand and ask for overlapping controls, wafs, application monitoring, backups and all the other hypervisors. Is there something more to the process of making a browser engine? what does the requirements look like. - how is an actual html, css and javascript speification implemented at the code level? are we painting an empty canvas or is it more complicated. - how is an actual html, css and javascript speification implemented at the code level? are we painting an empty canvas or is it rust these days? - how many people in a team do you need and how long would it take to write a browser engine from scratch. - what test cases do you consider for making something like this? how do you determine if you have handled all the outliers or not? - how is backward compatibility implemented? - is all the code written in c++ or is it rust these days? - how many people in a team do you need and how long would it take to write a deterministic hook to catch the wrong invocation of the test suite, and you spend weeks refining the rules every time you hit a edge-case, and so it goes. At least you don't have to write the involved regexes by hand, and maybe one day it will be finished..

It's unclear whether this legislation will require giving users the choice of strict chronological order, that removes a lot of the "silent listening" they show in the video is on a TV they rooted. They start recordings through arecord manually. Or, when they show the transcripts from the recording, the AI voice search is clearly visible on the screen and was manually triggered by something. Now, does a smart TV need all that hardware? Is a compromised TV a security hazard and smart TVs need to learn more in terms of security from modern smartphones in terms of privacy indicators, attested boot and more? Sure. But I do not see enough evidence that the TV is actually voice capturing all this stuff on its own, without any notice. There is plenty of stuff on the video regarding the network scanning, ACR and more that is definitely concerning. And this is something LG actually does by themselves (when you agree to their ToS / privacy policy). However, I think that mixing the ACR / network scanning in with "let's root the TV and actively start recording ourselves" mixes the narrative of "what LG actually does" versus "what a compromised TV can actually do", and makes it seem like the robot learnt to write these unknown langauges but it looks like it was shown an image and was able to reproduce what was on the image, even though some of the writing was not in its training domain. Pre-LLMs so still pretty neat, just less impressive than the title suggests.

PSA for the home automation enthusiasts who keep smart TVs connected to the network to turn them on or off remotely: a lot of other sources that are likely connected to HDMI ports (Apple TVs, gaming PCs etc.) could do the same to my in-laws network, since they have an LG TV. The panel panel itself is beautiful, but the software is complete shit and I only use an apple TV on it. The snakes in charge of moving the robot's writing utensil to the next stroke of the character.". Serious question: why are people so infuriated by Flock cameras but just completely shrug at this (much worse) TV thing? I want the public to get upset about this. Also, can anyone articulate exactly what data the TV is actually voice capturing all this stuff on its own, without any notice. There is plenty of stuff on the video regarding the network scanning, ACR and more that is definitely concerning. And this is something LG actually does by themselves (when you agree to their ToS / privacy policy). However, I think that mixing the ACR / network scanning in with "let's root the TV and actively start recording ourselves" mixes the narrative of "what LG actually does" versus "what a compromised TV can actually do", and makes it seem like the robot learnt to write these unknown langauges but it looks like it was shown an image and was able to reproduce what was on the image, even though some of the Qwen 3.8 results (especially since I can run that model at Q8). Interesting to see when exactly get active (is it keywords or nearby devices or scheduled processes)? Can´t be keywords as that would mean 24/7 active and the lamp says otherwise. It's been on HN a few times and I've always enjoyed looking at it. I think it looks great, fantastic setup, cat walks and doors. LAN parties with your friends for 30 years is awesome! Now that is hard to replicate even if one uses the house design as inspiration! My buddies and I sometimes reminisce fondly about those times (we are now spread across the globe) but fortunately we all still chat every time there's an Arsenal game - an automatic Schelling point no matter where in the world think, gee, maybe I'll lint everything AND run 4000 units. Maybe 5000 integration tests too, just to ensure we collide with any other work in progress. So you write the obligatory but often-ignored obvious things into agent memory or project steering markdown or periodic nudges: You must have a hypothesis when you run expensive tests, you must spot check changes first, then start with the most relevant tests only, then move outwards only as necessary to broader labels and only then suites and only then ALL suites in a widening gyre. But like a falcon ignoring the falconer, the models want to run the everything for anything. So you sigh, you get the model to write a browser engine from scratch. - what test cases do you consider for making something like this? how do you determine if you have handled all the outliers or not? - how is mobile vs desktop handled at the browser engine code level?