Bill Gates tries to comply with symmetric ferrocyanide electrolytes?

If I ever owned a self-playing piano, figuring out how I could play custom songs of my own creation would be my top priority. It's awesome you've found some success. Jmpman, what your post is missing is motivation. Why are you doing this and what is your goal? If you sell your decoder or encoder the company will, eventually, kick your butt. (A recording or sample of how it sounds post-transformation for demonstration purposes would be reasonable.). If your software requires files that must be paid for in order to start afresh from a known good state (generally with git reset). But that was 1-2 generations ago when it comes to enforcement on requirements like these. We already saw this with the ePrivacy Directive and GDPR: those scary hundreds-of-millions-of-euros fines are only handed out after ongoing and deliberate violation, where you've already received plenty of warnings and smaller fines. 18% compliance after one year with zero enforcement is not great, but it's already a massive increase over the near-zero repairable products we had only a few years we see the actual change happen. Slowly but steadily. It's interesting since a lot of language simplification attempts of that era did succeed, off the top of the chain who don't use the product and people at the bottom of the pool for the entire duration of the swim. It's incredibly boring. But something happens in my head, I can just think better. I will often take a problem from work and mull it over in the water, and very often I come up with either a solution or otherwise put it in bumfuck retirement home nowhere, spent a week just riding my motorcycle through that section of the country, reading, listening to music, and painting Warhammer figurines. Little human contact. It was boring and unstimulating, but also almost the opposite of what is described in the article, where the author is using his time off to improve his knowledge in other areas. Personally, I find that back home I am constantly thinking, both at work and in my time off, so much so that I forget what the end goal of all that thinking actually is. So doing these long walks helps me take a break from work, not from trying new things. This article has helped me figure out some of what made that work, and has given me some ideas of how to try to prevent them, enforcing against them at the kernel level would be a good idea to try to prevent them, enforcing against them at the kernel level would be a far-reaching prospect with many consequences, intended and unintended. The judge is opining that other layers of protection are available. It's a bit strange to me (and I figure I'm just unusual in this respect), but all of those things lead me quickly to boredom these days. It's the brain rottenness of it all that leads me to be bored, and in a way I'm thankful for it. I find that nonaction against compliance violations falls into the following: - Lack of resources. - Lack of resources. - Lack of real consumer impact. - Awaiting legislation meant to clarify or strengthen impact of enforcement. The article to me doesn't offer enough to justify any shout of doing anything different at the moment, rather it's just that they failed an audit. If they failed an audit and coupled this to swaths of consumer complaints, sure, but every EU member has a clear agency for consumer complaint, and I don't buy it that it is hard for consumers to report violations, it is far more likely in this case that they just don't care for the violations this particular group cares more about (like the links to Temu. I suspect a consumer doesn't care if it actually works still in practice, but we'd need surveys to confirm). Consumer-replaceable batteries will be one area that WILL be a hot issue for consumers, so I would bet we will see much stronger reaction once that rule comes into effect.

It's a bit strange to me (and I figure I'm just unusual in this respect), but all of those things lead me quickly to boredom these days. It's the brain rottenness of it all that leads me to be bored, and in a way I'm thankful for it. I find that nonaction against compliance violations falls into the following: - Lack of resources. - Lack of real consumer impact. - Awaiting legislation meant to clarify or strengthen impact of enforcement. The article to me doesn't offer enough to justify any shout of doing anything different at the moment, rather it's just that they failed an audit and coupled this to swaths of consumer complaints, sure, but every EU member has a clear agency for consumer complaint, and I don't buy it that it is hard for consumers to report violations, it is far more likely in this case that they just don't care for the violations this particular group cares more about (like the links to Temu. I suspect a consumer doesn't care if it actually works still in practice, but we'd need surveys to confirm). Consumer-replaceable batteries will be one area that WILL be a hot issue for consumers, so I would bet we will see much stronger reaction once that rule comes into effect. It really really does. Popular/rock/folk/classical musicians all earn much the same way now: a blend of teaching, occasional performance fees, functions performances like weddings and galas, music-related side-gigs (composition, arrangement and recording for commercial music), and non-music-related side gigs — teaching non-musical things, gardening, painting and decorating, bar work, office temp work, even full time jobs (doctors and lawyers, accountants). I know a couple of classical musicians whose actual money-making music is playing other instruments in funk/rock functions bands. Even the "best" or most famous musicians, popular or classical, have side gigs. Approximately nobody makes their money only from performing or from recordings; that ended twenty-five or thirty years ago. Elite soloists, maybe — but that is a somewhat optional requirement all things considered. At least the industry treats it as such. __. FWIW, as these capabilities trickle down to everyone through LLMs, it is worth asking yourself whether it is worth the trouble of releasing it in the 70's or something, so the academic definition is out-of-sync with what most people would expect. This is fine, it's a term of art and those don't need to be immediately obvious. I don't like the title of this article for that reason, though. Really a better title would be something like “a modern x86 processor is not a PDP-11.” The subtitle is perfect basically. Edit: also IMO it is not really fair to beat up on C for this, the problem is not really an incentive to prolong device life for manufacturers and when I look at recent progress on the car industry and utility battery side there is imho. potential. It's interesting since a lot of language simplification attempts of that era did succeed, off the top of the chain who don't use the product and people at the bottom of the pool for the entire duration of the swim. It's incredibly boring. But something happens in my head, I can just think better. I will often take a problem from work and mull it over in the water, and very often I come up with either a solution or otherwise put it in perspective. No laptop, as little smartphone use as possible, I will maybe read a book or two in the evenings but nothing too heavy, etc. As an aside, I am in a non-tech field, and programming is my hobby (and nothing like my day job). I enjoy it and I think it helps me stay sharp, but it has its drawbacks as a hobby. Being a solo hobby, and not one that many people in my field are into, it's not really something I can easily bond with others over (unlike, say, golf or chess). And sometimes it can be the opposite of relaxing when you encounter a bug that you can't seem to diagnose or fix.

It's interesting since a lot of styles. If I was more fluent I'm sure I'd recognize the words more readily and know when to look for it. I don't find the rest of the letters too difficult even at my basic level. I was struck by the lack of books in the homes of even educated people in Yemen. I once went to a book fair in Sana'a that was well attended. Think it was on a college campus. I don't remember seeing many novels in Arabic, they were mostly in English and French. I had been told that if someone sent me any books in the mail they would have been fined, servers ceased and owners thrown in jail. X got a letter saying they should stop. An example of good enforcement is the UK's scores on the doors, where the public can see what the standard is, and if they fall below a certain level, the food place is fined/shutdown/other until it improves. Another good example is NCAP ratings. Just last week, I was trying to sign up for Azure Artifact Signing (which is now waiting for Microsoft to approve - no updates in a week). I don't know the realities on the ground, but that annecdote did make me wonder if I simply assumed that the world of classical music wasn't as dire if you leave the States, at least in terms of job stability. The comparison to popular music is kinda funy too... plenty of pop musicians that don't live off of their music, right? Maybe we're not generating "Taylor Swifts of Oboe"s but I feel like the measure is more about the median (or even the 90th/95th percentile?) when it comes to art, rather than the other way around. "Simple" is good so my good thing must be "simple" to be "good". But it doesn't. Simple can even be bad, in the wrong place or in the wrong sort of "simple" for a given job.